Can indicators help us to create more sustainable cities?

Whilst the answer to this question may seem to be axiomatic, I argue that we need to better understand the kind of work sustainability indicators can do inside local government. Too often studies about indicators focus either on the science that goes into their development seeking to make them rational and relevant or on the soft impacts such as social capital, community empowerment or capacity building that are outcomes of their use. When attention is turned to what effect they have on policy, it is often difficult to discern any link between their use and policy change. My article in Local Environment (an earlier version can also be found here) seeks to address this problem by consolidating current thinking on indicators and asking the question: How far have notions of governance been incorporated into current research into indicators? The answer to this question has implications for the continuing utility of indicators as policy tools, not only in so far as they are able to aid the evaluation of policy, but also, and arguably more importantly, in how they are able to facilitate relationships between actors and act a catalyst around which various contested meanings of sustainability can be evaluated.

The article concludes that indicators may provide two important benefits to cities and citizens striving to create more sustainable places.  The first is that indicators play a role in developing and constructing what it means to “do” sustainable development.  In other words, their creation and implementation help us to frame the way we talk about sustainability and act as sites for innovation to occur.  Secondly, and in my mind most importantly, indicators themselves act as portals of communication between and within departments and across the divide between formal government and civill society.  Their use and the negotiation of their meaning creates the opportunity for dialogue to occur about sustainability and for this to be more normalised in our daily life.

Much of the work that we have undertaken with the Cities’ Biodiversity Index recognises these principles along with the importance of sound science on which to base vital decisions about the future of biodiversity in cities.


3 thoughts on “Can indicators help us to create more sustainable cities?

  1. Dear Dr. Nancy:
    Thank you for posting this. 🙂
    I wonder if you could suggest a Reference or Bibliography for sustainable indicators, because as you post it they are beneficial helping us understand what actually means to do sustainable development.
    Also which indicator you would consider are the strongest/more trustable to use?

    Thanks again,

    Have a great weekend!

    • Hi Joaquìn – There are several works out there that can help lead you to other references on sustainability indicators. The article that I mention in this blog is a literature review so that would be one good sources of additional references.

      Regarding the ‘best’ indicator to use, that is a bit hard to determine as local context matters so very much and indicators get used in spaces of governance so very differently. There are two publications that I would point to here, both come from an European Union project looking at the impact of SI’s. The first was the academic report, which is available here. The second is the practice based report, which you can find here.

      Hope you find this helpful!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s